Catch dashboard integrity risks before leadership acts on the chart.
Run a first-pass AI integrity review, fix and rerun until the dashboard is clean, then escalate high-risk executive dashboards for guided review.
Dashboard Integrity Review
Selected window may overstate improvement.
The chart starts after the contraction period, which can make the recovery look like sustained growth.
Comparison may mix unlike periods.
The month-over-month labels appear consistent, but the underlying date coverage should be verified before CFO review.
The problems normal dashboard QA misses.
Misleading comparisons
Flags risky baselines, mismatched periods, cherry-picked windows, and weak comparison framing.
Visual integrity risks
Finds truncated axes, scale issues, dual-axis risk, labeling gaps, and clutter that can distort judgment.
Executive exposure
Separates routine clean-up from findings that could affect CFO reviews, board narratives, or operating decisions.
Start with the AI engine. Escalate only when the risk deserves it.
The AI engine is the check engine light. Guided review explains what the warning means before leadership acts on the chart.
Scan
Upload an executive dashboard, board-deck chart, or recurring analytics report.
Review
Get a score, failed rules, penalties, evidence, and a PDF audit trail.
Iterate
Accept, reject, fix, and rerun the dashboard until the review is clean enough for circulation.
Escalate
If the dashboard has CFO, board, investor, or operating-review exposure, upgrade the scan to guided review.
A repeatable review layer before the meeting.
Run the dashboard
Score the dashboard against 77 rules plus 15 bonus integrity checks.
Accept, reject, and iterate
Use the findings as a working review queue. Accept the fixes that matter, reject harmless flags, revise the dashboard, and rerun the audit until the report is clean enough to send.
Escalate only when needed
Use guided review when repeated findings or executive exposure make the issue bigger than one dashboard.
The sticky value is not one score. It is the rerun loop.
Teams can run a dashboard, fix the visible issues, rerun the audit, and keep a cleaner PDF trail of what changed. That makes 77 Rules useful before every recurring executive review, not just during a one-time cleanup.
Accept, reject, iterate
- Accept findings that materially improve the dashboard.
- Reject harmless or context-specific findings with a clear rationale.
- Rerun until the dashboard is clean enough for leadership review.
Software scales the detection. Guided review builds the judgment.
The software flags symptoms. Guided review explains consequences.
What the software does
- Flags misleading scales, truncated axes, weak labels, clutter, and risky comparisons.
- Scores dashboards against 77 rules plus 15 bonus integrity checks.
- Creates a repeatable first-pass review workflow.
- Helps teams catch recurring issues before review meetings.
- Produces a PDF audit trail.
What guided review adds
- Explains which findings actually matter before an executive review.
- Separates cosmetic issues from decision-risk findings.
- Produces written recommendations for high-stakes dashboards.
- Helps the BI leader explain the risk one level up.
- Helps establish a reusable team review standard.
Dashboards hit a ceiling when they provide data but lack an audit trail. 77 Rules provides the missing governance layer for high-stakes decisions.
Team efficiency pays for the software. Executive decision risk justifies guided review.
Team efficiency pays for the software. Executive decision risk justifies guided review.
Use the calculator when the buying case is time saved, review consistency, and a lightweight audit trail. Use guided review when the dashboard influences leadership decisions and the cost of a bad frame is much larger than QA hours.
Quick buying rule
Software is enough when the team needs a repeatable first-pass check for recurring dashboards.
Guided review is needed when the dashboard affects CFO, board, investor, operating, or capital-allocation decisions.
What to tell your CFO.
Need approval for Team Annual or a Guided Pilot? Copy this into Slack or email and adapt it for your team.
Short version for Slack
Start self-serve. Escalate when the dashboard requires judgment.
Most teams start with Team Annual. Individual analysts can start smaller. High-risk dashboards move to guided review when judgment, approval support, or executive context matter.
Starter Annual
Individual self-serve access for recurring first-pass dashboard integrity checks.
See StarterPro Monthly
Monthly self-serve review for analysts and managers who need more frequent dashboard scans.
See MonthlyTeam Annual
10 seats for BI teams building a repeatable dashboard integrity review workflow.
See Team PricingGuided Pilot
Expert interpretation for high-visibility dashboards with executive exposure.
Request Pilot KitWhat guided review produces.
Software Findings
Score, failed rules, penalties, evidence notes, and PDF export.
Expert Notes
Which findings matter, which are harmless, and what to fix first.
CFO-Ready Summary
Recurring risk pattern, examples, and recommended review standard.
When software finds dashboard risk, guided review helps decide what to do next.
Software scales first-pass detection. Guided review exists only for dashboards where judgment, interpretation, and executive context matter.
Dashboard QA or decision-risk control?
If this is dashboard cleanup, a five-figure pilot is too much.
If these dashboards influence CFO reviews, board narratives, operating decisions, investor updates, or capital allocation, the risk is different. A chart can pass normal BI QA and still frame the decision incorrectly.
Request Guided ReviewTurn repeated findings into a shareable governance summary.
When recurring dashboard integrity patterns appear across multiple reviews, the product does more than show another score. It creates a concise summary your team can use before the next executive review.
1. Detect the pattern
Repeated integrity findings across dashboard families indicate a team review-standard issue, not just one weak chart.
2. Share the summary
The Team Governance Risk Summary gives your team concise language for Slack, Teams, email, or an approval packet.
3. Escalate only when needed
Guided review is recommended when software exposes executive exposure, recurring risk, or governance pain.
The buying logic.
Is 77 Rules dashboard polish?
No. The commercial point is decision risk, governance, and audit trail before leadership acts on the chart.
When is software enough?
When your team needs a repeatable first-pass review layer across recurring dashboards and reports.
When should we request guided review?
When the dashboard is tied to CFO review, board materials, investor updates, operating reviews, or capital allocation.
Do you store dashboards?
Dashboard review runs are stored in your account so you can review prior results until you delete them. Deleted runs are removed from active app storage; encrypted backups age out through normal rotation.