77 Rules77 Rules
ProductSelf-Serve AI ReviewPricingPosterCalculatorExpert ReviewStart Dashboard Review
Start
Calculator

Team efficiency pays for the software. Executive decision risk justifies guided review.

Use the calculator in two passes. First, show why Team Annual can pay for itself through repeated review work. Second, show why executive-facing dashboards need judgment beyond normal QA.

See Team AnnualRequest Guided PilotOpen Legacy ROI Calculator
Buying logic

Software first. Escalate only when risk warrants it.

Team Efficiency ROI

Justifies Team Annual

Review hours saved, repeated workflow, PDF audit trail.

Executive Risk ROI

Justifies guided review

CFO, board, investor, and operating-review exposure.

Team Annual justification

Calculate team review payback.

Inputs

This is a work-reduction calculator, not a promise of financial results.

Estimated annual value

Dashboards0
Hours saved0
Time value$0

Estimated software payback: 0x

Buy Team Annual
Executive-risk justification

Estimate the decision exposure behind guided review.

If the dashboard influences leadership decisions, the ROI is not just hours saved. It is the avoided cost of a chart that looks credible but frames the decision incorrectly.

Inputs

Use the size of budget, forecast, headcount, pipeline, operating, or capital decisions influenced by these dashboards.

Executive-risk frame

Annual exposure$0
Pilot share0%
EscalationJudgment

Request Guided Pilot
What guided review produces

The premium delta is visible artifacts, not more software screens.

1

Software Findings

Score, failed rules, penalties, PDF export, and a repeatable audit trail.

2

Expert Notes

Which findings matter, which are harmless, and what to fix first.

3

CFO-Ready Summary

Recurring risk pattern, examples, and recommended review standard.

Dashboard QA or decision-risk control?

Use guided review only when the decision warrants it.

If this is dashboard cleanup, a five-figure pilot is too much. If these dashboards influence CFO reviews, board narratives, operating decisions, investor updates, or capital allocation, the risk is different. A chart can pass normal BI QA and still frame the decision incorrectly.

Software ceiling

The software finds the pattern. Guided review helps your team decide what to do about it.

Request Guided Review
Ungated approval copy

What to tell your CFO.

Copy this into Slack, Teams, or email and adapt it for your team.

Subject: Dashboard integrity review for executive-facing reports We are requesting 77 Rules so our BI team can run a repeatable first-pass integrity review before dashboards reach leadership. This is not dashboard polish. The goal is to reduce the chance that executives act on a chart that looks credible but frames the decision incorrectly. The software handles recurring first-pass review: visual clarity checks, decision-risk patterns, scoring, and a PDF audit trail. For dashboards with executive, CFO, board, investor, or operating-review exposure, the guided pilot adds expert interpretation, written recommendations, and a reusable team review standard. The practical outcome is a better review layer before high-visibility dashboards reach leadership, plus examples our team can use to improve future dashboards.
Request Pilot Approval Kit

Short version for Slack

I want to evaluate 77 Rules for dashboard integrity review. It gives our BI team a repeatable first-pass check before dashboards reach leadership. For high-visibility dashboards, the guided pilot adds expert interpretation and written recommendations so we can separate cosmetic issues from decision-risk findings.